InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lazyeye

01/20/09 4:57 PM

#43762 RE: zguy #43755

C'mon. It's totally misleading. Why even put that in there in the first place? It's a suspicious, red flag statement imo.
icon url

PinkElephant

01/20/09 5:47 PM

#43772 RE: zguy #43755

I didn't miss it at all, in fact it was exactly my point.

The PR had no mention of AH prints, that PR didn't come until a whole year later. This PR was addressing the 'artificially low market cap'. How did they try mitigate shareholders concerns? ...by saying they hadn't been selling shares. Had they been selling shares at that point? -probably. Did Keith leave himself a loophole? -yes.

I know how you are interpreting it now. That is not how people were presenting it then. In fact, every time someone brought up the subject of dilution people would pitch a fit and quote this PR back to them. People didn't start changing their view of it until after they found out the O/S had gone up to 64M.