Replies to post #245862 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[The_Net]

Could written better. It should be "Upon the receipt of Samsung’s first payment..." instead "Subject to the receipt of Samsung’s first payment"

[gatticaa]

enos, you may be on to something there.


It may even be better than my working theory for the poor reaction which is, we are all just chumps! lol.

[vg_future]

enos, maybe, but I wouldn't put too much stress on that because Samsung filed an 8K (or something similar) on their side too.

JMHO,
vg_future

[my3sons87]

Enos, tell you broker that he is full of shat and does not understand the nature of what is happening in regard to the payments. If the money is not paid the litigation and arbitration and cour of appeals cases will be reactivated. In order for the appeals court case to be automatically dismissed on Feb 4, 2009 I say IDCC must be paid before hand. And for the ITC ALJ not to rule on 2/9/09 the monies must be paid before that date. Otherwise all actions will be alive.

From the 8K:


Subject to the receipt of Samsung's first payment due first quarter 2009, the parties will move to end all litigation and arbitration proceedings ongoing between them.