Replies to post #35988 on Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[The Holder]

I think you can cut that in half...maybe take a 3rd, for a conservative estimate...

...as there will very likely be some areas where no niobium (or very little, not worth the dig) will be found.

That calculation assumes a uniform depth and width of the contact zone over distance.

Of course, the flip side of that is that there could also be intervals of greater Niobium concentration at even greater depths and widths.

Good to be conservative, either way you slice it...awesome analytical results from the first hole.

[unbeREVABLE]

Oh wait thats easy. 120 m tons at 9.5 pounds Nb per ton. (maybe thats higher than 9.5 with a 0.53% compared to 0.47%)

I'm still confused, HELP.

[mytvsbroke]

145.5 meters = 477.36 feet are the depth numbers and we have an 800 foot drll hole to be assayed. I'm not feeling well since yesterday but I suggest doing it over the phone with Merle