InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1160
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/19/2008

Re: unbeREVABLE post# 35988

Tuesday, 01/13/2009 11:41:40 AM

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:41:40 AM

Post# of 165854
I think you can cut that in half...maybe take a 3rd, for a conservative estimate...

...as there will very likely be some areas where no niobium (or very little, not worth the dig) will be found.

That calculation assumes a uniform depth and width of the contact zone over distance.

Of course, the flip side of that is that there could also be intervals of greater Niobium concentration at even greater depths and widths.

Good to be conservative, either way you slice it...awesome analytical results from the first hole.