InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

tampa123

06/27/04 10:43 PM

#45525 RE: Weby #45509

Weby - You're absolutely correct in your assertions.

I suppose that without a contract with Intel, or others, the 'at-will' aspect of their agreement prohibits them from providing legitimate guidance, less than 6-months into the future.

But, wouldn't you think that if your predictions are valid, Wave would already know if that's gonna be the case, or not?


icon url

player1234

06/29/04 9:38 AM

#45672 RE: Weby #45509

Your math is in error.

To make $1 per share profit, they need to get about $87 million in revenue per annum. You need to account for about $20 million in operating expenses per year currently.
icon url

racer_x_trixie

06/27/05 4:55 PM

#85986 RE: Weby #45509

Weby, silly indeed... "Wave MUST move beyond the experiment to an adoptive technology." you REALLY think this "move" is WITHIN Wave's grasp to control?!!! silly, foolish mortals we are to think it's Wave's fault that the uptake on Wave's "products" hasn't been going extremely well.... SIMPLE FACT IS, follow the supply chain [SKS's keen perspective]... THE SUPPLY CHAIN AIN'T MOVING TCG PRODUCT 'CAUSE THE MARKET HASN'T YET FULLY ENGAGED