Well see, now there is the problem
When I replied to you after you posted that the "Truth" was that there was no short position that I would love to see a link to prove that, or was it opinion, Jim piped up and quoted legal precedent to show that every message on these boards is an opinion. That would cover the message you were replying to in which you suggested the SEC get involved. I was merely pointing out to him that someone should enlighten you to the fact that every message her is de facto opinion, therefore such suggestions of contacting the SEC only serve to make the utterer look foolish. Obviously, you disagree and there is some formula to determine which of these messages are opinion and which are statement of fact that must be supported.
Could the "non-touters" please get together and make sure you are all on the same page?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
