I do not understand why FDIC and JPM unreasonably challenged this issue.
Let's say: WMB that JPM purchased was a under age adopted son of WMI.
I spent lots money and raised the adopted son for years, I gets tax refund every year, but Now my adopted son turned back to his own parents, you tell me ,AM I entitled for the tax refund from previous years for supporting the adopted son, or his parents gets the tax refund for the previous years that they did not paid anything to support his son?
Is this simple question helpful to answer why the NOL ought to belong to WMI ?