Replies to post #72226 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[3GDollars]

Gamco,

Good point. But, what's the heck, sue them anyway. Send a message that we mean business.

As I understand it (which may be flawed), it is not infringement for Novatel Wireless to produce it, but rather for them to sell it and profit from it. Like so many other things in life, timing is everything! Thus IDCC must wait until sales take place with sufficient volume to justify costly enforcement.

[mschere]

Good post(You make a point that seems to be lost on most) ..but my 2 cents..It has been Historical IP owner's practice to not only let potential licensees to manufacture and test devices that utilize their Proprietary IP..but also wait for the potential licensee to go COMMERCIAL..A Novatel/Cingular test in Atlanta IMO: Does not meet that Historical criteria..

As I understand it (which may be flawed), it is not infringement for Novatel Wireless to produce it, but rather for them to sell it and profit from it. Like so many other things in life, timing is everything! Thus IDCC must wait until sales take place with sufficient volume to justify costly enforcement. JMHO