InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Sarmad

10/21/08 10:45 PM

#69827 RE: smooth2o #69823

>> Without a license to x86, I don't think AMD could sell parts...

Aren't the patents for original x-86 over 20 years old, and therefor no longer exclusive to Intel ?
icon url

Golfbum

10/21/08 11:34 PM

#69831 RE: smooth2o #69823

smooth

as long as they aren't caught running afoul of the terms they get to keep anything that was covered during the agreement. iirc the agreement also stipulates that both companies cross licensed anything prior to the start of the agreement.

so amd's jeapordy would be limited to what intel starting jan 1, 2011, that they wouldn't have license to.

gb
icon url

Temp-

10/22/08 4:41 AM

#69834 RE: smooth2o #69823

Without a license to x86, I don't think AMD could sell parts...

It is in Intel interest to have a broad cross-license agreement with AMD, which has a strong patent portfolio related to Intel core activites. Of course, AMD also needs such an agreement to operate their current business, but there is much at stake for both companies.
icon url

Windsock

10/22/08 11:00 AM

#69857 RE: smooth2o #69823

The negotiation after license expiration would be for a Renewal of the License Agreement to cover patents filed beginning Jan 1, 2011 and going forward. Assuming normal expiration all of the patents filed in before the end of the capture period at the end of 2010 are licensed for the life of the patents.

The License covering 2001 through 2010 is actually a 4th generation License Agreement. and it was negotiated and signed after the expiration of the 3rd generation license that covered the 1996 to 2000 period.