InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

The Rainmaker

10/04/08 4:20 PM

#15237 RE: cottonmather #15236

Still waiting for you to provide this info, can't really talk about any other topics with you until you back up this earlier post or were you just bluffing about this. It's OK if you made this part up just confess to the board you made it up....or provide the proof. Post some K's that said there was a contractual obligation to maintain a minimum stock price.

thanks

Posted by: The Rainmaker Date: Saturday, October 04, 2008 2:14:41 PM
In reply to: cottonmather who wrote msg# 15226 Post # of 15236
you wrote
But someone has a contractual obligation or physical benefit at .004 (or both). Should the stock stray below that for much of any period one can estimate it has been chosen the deal is off. Read a K and find more about this.


I never read any K that said if a stock price went below a certain price some type of deal was off please post a couple of examples. If you don't post any examples of a K with this type deal in it everyone on the board will know you are making things up again.

icon url

Myth

10/04/08 5:05 PM

#15239 RE: cottonmather #15236

Huge amount of profit taking, I'm surprised that wolf.. wolf wolf.. doesn't tell you that. Delay of ENHD hurt, you know no one waits in pink land, one things for certain, the weak bash attempts haven't had much effect.... a two yr old could see through them...lol..


prepare apologys
your welcome