InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

zolax

10/03/08 11:36 AM

#16482 RE: Gold Seeker #16481

Goldseeker is that two false positives?
icon url

opportunityknocking

10/03/08 11:45 AM

#16484 RE: Gold Seeker #16481

I think you really upset alot of people with distorting FACTS. I am sorry Great Grandma, Erthang, and Mysscat and the many other shareholders that were scared of losing their investment by following the OPINIONS of lay individuals that spend 24/7 to convince you that recaf is not viable. I would say that today is yet another game changer. Another significant achievement.
First comment was the individuals be tested from a small sample of saliva already had advanced cancer, big deal. Common sense from a research standpoint would be to test advanced cancer because if recaf were not viable at this stage why proceed. Are you going to send a spaceship to Mars first or go to the Moon to see if it is even a possibility.
I am sorry, but these individuals are not research scientists that post on this board. Also, Dr Moro cleary stated that he will be able to achieve 100% sensitivity by making small adjustments. Read it yourself those are Dr Moro's words not mine.
I would bet the farm that he is thinking about testing for recaf in urine? Anyone else agree?

icon url

doggone01

10/03/08 12:10 PM

#16486 RE: Gold Seeker #16481

Cunningly Deceive-those results are great compared to your PSA or CEA or whatever . You have lost your money by selling and getting others to sell Stop the Cunningly Deceptive pratice of Bashing and come over to the light side Gold Seeker,I sound like Obe Knobbee!Your Failure can be a new beginning on the side of BioCurex!