InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 927
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/27/2005

Re: Gold Seeker post# 16481

Friday, 10/03/2008 11:45:47 AM

Friday, October 03, 2008 11:45:47 AM

Post# of 30387
I think you really upset alot of people with distorting FACTS. I am sorry Great Grandma, Erthang, and Mysscat and the many other shareholders that were scared of losing their investment by following the OPINIONS of lay individuals that spend 24/7 to convince you that recaf is not viable. I would say that today is yet another game changer. Another significant achievement.
First comment was the individuals be tested from a small sample of saliva already had advanced cancer, big deal. Common sense from a research standpoint would be to test advanced cancer because if recaf were not viable at this stage why proceed. Are you going to send a spaceship to Mars first or go to the Moon to see if it is even a possibility.
I am sorry, but these individuals are not research scientists that post on this board. Also, Dr Moro cleary stated that he will be able to achieve 100% sensitivity by making small adjustments. Read it yourself those are Dr Moro's words not mine.
I would bet the farm that he is thinking about testing for recaf in urine? Anyone else agree?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.