InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Gold Seeker

10/03/08 11:27 AM

#16481 RE: doggone01 #16479

Dog, I will lay it out a little clearer for you.

15 advanced stage cancer patients were tested. Those are patients where cancer has spread to other ograns. 13 out of the 15 patients tested positive. Two of the advanced stage patients did not test positive but you could probably see those two no doubt were showing other clinical signs.

As for the normals, there were 22 of them and they should have been healthy with no cancer. 2 of the 22 tested positive for cancer via the saliva test. That's not good.
icon url

Kag

10/03/08 2:38 PM

#16499 RE: doggone01 #16479

Doggone,
I did not mention the 22 normal donors because the point of my post was that the 15 cancer patients all had widespread cancer. So far, the research presented in today's press release only indicated that it detected cancer in patients with widespread cancer. It is obvious that doctors could have detected the cancer without the use of any kind of universal cancer detection test. kag