InvestorsHub Logo

swinging for the fence

06/04/04 4:57 PM

#15846 RE: janice shell #15842

ahhh but you have absolutely no proof. This is getting comical.

let it ride

06/04/04 4:57 PM

#15848 RE: janice shell #15842

if there is to many shares out how come it takes so long to get a buy fill at the asking price?

JNelson

06/04/04 5:02 PM

#15854 RE: janice shell #15842

'janice shell'

You can also turn that around.... Because Urbie raised the A/S to 500B the MM'ers shorted big time because they thought that Urbie was going to sell them,,,,, guess what,,,, maybe he did not sell any of them and the MM'ers are just now trying to cover,,,,

trade15

06/04/04 5:06 PM

#15856 RE: janice shell #15842

Hello janice

Common sense from your way of looking at things. So we are back to logic and how we as individuals apply logic to a particular situation. So let's just suppose the law firm was retained to deal with a short issue. From your vast experience , what effect could this possible action have on the share price of CMKX ? I don't know about you , but I've often foubd that logic doesn't work very well when dealing with the stock market.

trade15

junkmasterg

06/04/04 5:29 PM

#15886 RE: janice shell #15842

I thought the volume was fairly

large and consistent even before the A/S was raised.

Do you have any clue what all those 9 million block trades were that went on for weeks?

retirement?