InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PRmaniac

09/22/08 4:02 PM

#10739 RE: Howardhaftel #10736

Of course you see something.

Obviously you overlooked the fact that 95% reduction of the "public" shares is almost no shares at all. Do you not think that in itself is misleading? Wouldn't correct disclosure be to tell people how many shares are "public" so they would know that 95% reduction still leaves anywhere from 8 to 15 billion non-public shares in the share pool?

I sure wish the SEC wiould set more examples of companies that prey on the gullible investors.