InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 71
Posts 17460
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/29/2008

Re: Howardhaftel post# 10736

Monday, 09/22/2008 4:02:24 PM

Monday, September 22, 2008 4:02:24 PM

Post# of 41474
Of course you see something.

Obviously you overlooked the fact that 95% reduction of the "public" shares is almost no shares at all. Do you not think that in itself is misleading? Wouldn't correct disclosure be to tell people how many shares are "public" so they would know that 95% reduction still leaves anywhere from 8 to 15 billion non-public shares in the share pool?

I sure wish the SEC wiould set more examples of companies that prey on the gullible investors.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.