"interestingly, you use a lot of impressive numbers which
reminds me of something my dad said. "if you want folks
to believe you even if you are lieing, use fractions.
everyone will think that you know what you are talking
about.""
Yeah, sorry about that. I just have this habit of trying to underpin the points I make with facts and data.
I can see how that would unsettle some folk, but it's just a thing I do. Can't help it.
Tell you what, though. Rather than imply I'm "lieing" (a bit like lying, I guess) why not take me through where it is my numbers are wrong, and show why the assumption that BIPH's pps will hold even after a few more tens of millions of shares have been issued to BIPH's "sewer rat" cronies, is not as ridiculous as I think it seems.
That would be a bit more convincing as an argument than an innate, or indeed inherited, distrust of those who would back their arguments with quantitative data.
TIA.