Replies to post #148820 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[jonesieatl]

Isn't that something?

Two last trades, 450,000 shares each, one at .0050 then one at .0049

With what seems to be a lot of time in front of us before anything meaningful can happen , I wonder how long this price range will hold up?

From the time the CC was first mentioned and today , NEOM saw lows of .0022 and highs of .0077. (Tell us thank you YAGI , that must have worked well for you)

The PPS spent a lot more time below .005 than it did above it ... and we kindasorta had something to look forward to during that time.

During that time we heard all the 'good' news about:

NeoMedia and Papa John's Deliver FREE Pizza on the Go
NeoMedia and Format Dynamics Join Forces to Integrate Innovations in Online & Offline Advertising
NeoMedia Shareholder Conference Call Information Released
NeoMedia Secures $8.7 Million Financing Commitment to Accelerate Implementation Plans
Easy Access to Mobile Content on the Go - NeoReader for the iPhone
NeoMedia's Patent Review Moves to Next Phase; Focus Is on Jumpstarting the Category
neo@ogilvy Gets NeoReader and NeoSphere

One seeming difference between Iain and Chip:

Iain isn't averse to putting out PRs which do nothing for the stock price.

Chip seemed not to like doing that , as we went around 9 months with essentially no PRs at all under Chip.

Perhaps that's why YAGI made the change , hoping that a little more PR-pumping would help the price? If so , they must be a little disappointed.

Who knows.

JMO

jonesie

[boknows 1]

It's needed a "revamp" for a long, long time.....

[clawmann]

Only when the entire financial system is about to crash around their F@#$%%NG EARS and politicians begin to ask "Where were the regulators? Why did they allow this to happen?"

They were sitting on their hands listening to silly arguments about how shorting helps ensure market liquidity.

It is - believe it or not - like the tainted infant formula problem in China. Governments just don't take steps to correct a problem until it surfaces in a big way. The only reason we got the first federal securities law in 1933 was because of the Great Depression.

[cloud3]

You got that right, Personalizit. It's astounding to me that up until even days ago, some of the talking heads on CNBC were expressing doubt that NSS is even contributing to the decline.

The outrage of the century.