ShallowMind: I would assume that any offers that IDCC made to Samsung during negotiations were conditional offers. Therefore when refused, that offer is no longer on the table. If Samsung loses and an injunction is issued, they cannot just come back and say we will now accept your offer. At that stage there will be a different, and assuredly an offer more in IDCC's favor, then any previous offers. That is why you hear about settlements on the court house steps before a decision is rendered.
in reply to:
Why hasn't there been a settlement by now?
I've been pondering that question for a while, trying to keep the thought process free of influence of perpetual optimism this board creates, and have formulated the theory that Samsung thinks the pressure to compromise to reach a settlement is all on IDCC.
So...what underpins that theory? Just this. The downside for Sammy is limited. Some folks here will dispute that, claiming that an injunction is a big, BIG hammer. However, we've already offered Sammy a license and, if the ALJ rules in our favor, all Sammy has to do is accept our offer. That's THEIR worst case. Game over.