Replies to post #232918 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[lastchoice]

because... i don't believe they are in conflict. i am succinctly stating that qcom raped some of the market, and the rapees are angry.

i attended an ieee seminar on lte, and the first statement was that the industry debated ofdm for 3g and made the mistake of using cdma. the industry was now moving aggressively to shift to ofdm for lte to eliminate the qcom tax. still, i don't believe it was qcom's responsibility to lower their royalties. however, do you see nok signing for the same 5% on all standards? did you see qcom structuring a creative solution to allow nok a lower rate, but still trying to preserve their other license opportunities?

manufacturers are trying to adjust the qcom tax. i don't blame them. qcom's value to the wcdma chain is nowhere near what it was to cdma2000.

[bulldzr]

JeffreyHF, "Castigating Qualcomm for the success of their products and intellectual property seems like nothing but envy and sour grapes."

Hey buddy, I don't know what posts you are reading, but what you are saying with this statement was NEVER said nor infered in this particular thread of posts, started by mine, answered by JimLur and responded to by you. As it relates to this thread of posts, this accusation is a figment of your imagination in my opinion.

[e5oo]

"...seems like nothing but envy and sour grapes."

That's my read. Maybe someday IDCC will earn the same sentiments.