Replies to post #170834 on Wave Systems Corp. (fka WAVXQ)

[Weby]

Wildman

I agree with your hesitancy. If it's there, and real, it probably should not be there.

When I read it in the post, it seemed ambiguous to me --Is it somebody else Wave is working with who recently partnered with HP? That they could say. Still Wave has been known to make mistaqkes. What grade level, after all, reviewed this job announcement?

On the broader issue of Wave/HP I continue to be optimistic. There's the HDD interoperability issue for which Wave provides HP a solution.

THere's the question I asked BB at a shm two or three years ago.
Can HP do remote authentication? He replied to the effect -- Not unless they are developing something. So far there's no indication that they have developed their own method for remote authentication within TC, and remote authentication is more and more being talked about as mobile warriors and Web 2.0 applications in the cloud gain momentum. It's been a long long wait, but it ain't over until the final out -- and that could be a couple of decades from now!!! Dead Cat Bounce was half right -- we've gotten down to the equivilent of 14 cents, and the sky is falling!!! I'd be down and out if forced margin sales hadn't made me sell and buy lower too too many times. (As I've often said here, "Everything is its opposite!"). Now if the opposite of .44 cents share price is 44 million in 2009 revenue, wouldn't that be AWESOME!

[nelzoni]

Wildman you are correct that "It would seem very careless to list "just partnered with HP" on a job site when no public disclosure of such has been made."
But that does not mean it was not done. It is not like Wave hasn't been careless before. -

[barge]

Wildman--The HP Just Partnered line was undoubtedly as you put it "careless". That's exactly what excites me especially in the CONTEXT of the very convincing DD on this board that pretty much says that HP is DEAD IN THE INTEROPERABLE OCEAN OF TRUST AND SECURITY WITHOUT LITTLE OLE WAVE!!!!!

The HP/WAVE partnership obviously hasn't been finalized otherwise we'd have heard about it by now.