IQ-no claims were taken from the company, as the company had no claims to begin with. They has a leasehold interest in other people'z claims, and agreements to invest a certain amount in exploration. The leases lapsed, and CMKX did not honor its exploration agreements. End of story.
No claims were taken from the company. The whole claim issue has been discussed countless times before on this board. Did you ever read what was written ... by people who have experience in these matters? If so, on what basis do you disagree with them?
Did CMKX have any special clauses in their contracts that would make them different than any of the other dozens and dozens of companies up there? Was CMKX granted any special privileges by the Canadian government? Or, did they have to live by the same rules by which all the others have had to live?
but if CMKX gets its finances they will most likely challange the claims that have been taken from the company.
No claims were "taken away from the company". The company never held any claims to begin with. And the claims they controlled through Koch were allowed to lapse.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
