InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Iris_F

08/13/08 1:44 PM

#28171 RE: Cee-It #28169

I agree. I think we've heard from a lot of people on this matter and no sense beating a dead horse further in the ground.
There is no value spending so MUCH time discussing something that is not part of anything CURRENTLY happening. Maybe one day ONEV could have a claim? They will either prevail or not prevail IF such claims occur. I think many of us here see others have gone in a different direction rather than work with ONEV. Will there be legal challenges in ANY direction in the future? We'll see.




icon url

Ugo22

08/13/08 1:45 PM

#28172 RE: Cee-It #28169

This appears to be a 1st, 2nd or 3rd Generation embedded process dependednt on the two models listed, that is hooking up with a Google process.

Google Voice Search patent talks about the problems with this current process of VR as does this article. In my opinion this is not a complete result of the Google voice search patent. Google patented a Voice Google Search done the ONEV way from start to finish and actually highlights why what ONEV patented is needed. After much debate they were awarded a patent on doing a Google search the ONEV way.... Thats my opinion on it....

http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2008/07/nicely-said-google-maps-for-mobile-with.html

"This feature is experimental, which means a couple of things. First, similar to other voice-recognition technologies, the accuracy of voice recognition will improve over time as more people use the voice search feature. Second, the feature is currently only supported on 8110, 8120 and 8130 BlackBerry Pearl models in the US. Third, we'd love to get your feedback on it -- feel free to leave your comments below."