Replies to post #145348 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[in4it]

My apology.

I later realized that I had the document from July 26, 2007.

Still, it is, IMO, that this paperwork is from Neomedia not responding to the USPTO in the required time frame to the EFF filing for the 3 time to get the paperwork right.

By NEOM not responding:
1.) They got rid of the EFF so they are not in the talks with the USPTO along with NEOM.


NEOM knew that they woiudl get this response because the EFF is:
1.) Lazy
2.) Standard for the USPTO in response to the EFF claims against NEOM.
3.) NEOM knew all of the prior art to be brought up.
4.) Gives NEOM a chance to answer back and update the patent/s in question to strengthen them, along with better clarification.
5.) NEOM only has to deal with USPTO now.

This is IMO,
Sorry for the typos.
We on this board knew this was going to happen because NEOM choose not to respond.
in4it