![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:47:41 PM
I later realized that I had the document from July 26, 2007.
Still, it is, IMO, that this paperwork is from Neomedia not responding to the USPTO in the required time frame to the EFF filing for the 3 time to get the paperwork right.
By NEOM not responding:
1.) They got rid of the EFF so they are not in the talks with the USPTO along with NEOM.
NEOM knew that they woiudl get this response because the EFF is:
1.) Lazy
2.) Standard for the USPTO in response to the EFF claims against NEOM.
3.) NEOM knew all of the prior art to be brought up.
4.) Gives NEOM a chance to answer back and update the patent/s in question to strengthen them, along with better clarification.
5.) NEOM only has to deal with USPTO now.
This is IMO,
Sorry for the typos.
We on this board knew this was going to happen because NEOM choose not to respond.
in4it
Reliant Coffee Debuts at #271 on the Inc. 5000 List of Fastest Growing Companies - Coffee Service Industry Disruptor Brews Up Exponential Growth Sep 5, 2024 11:51 AM
VAYK Confirms Receiving Revenue from First Airbnb Property with 1.4 Million Annual Revenue Goal • VAYK • Sep 4, 2024 9:34 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Expands Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: New Lens Intercepts 21.75 m at 5.25 g/t Gold & 515 ppm Cobalt • MFL • Sep 4, 2024 9:02 AM
Integrated Ventures Acquires 51% Stake In GetTrim.Com (TM), Telemedicine Platform With Focus On Expansion Into Booming GLP-1 Powered Weight Loss Market • INTV • Sep 4, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Announces Strategic Review Process Intended to Maximize Shareholder Value • AVAI • Sep 4, 2024 8:00 AM
PickleJar Launches National "Get on the Bus" Campaign, Unveils Thompson Square Tour Bus Wrap • PKLE • Sep 4, 2024 7:17 AM