InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Cee-It

06/21/08 11:55 AM

#22884 RE: SirFelix #22883

Obviously you are not aware of the perils of pinksheet status.

First, the costs quoted by Ferris seem highly inflated from what I recall reading about three months ago when I investigated reporting costs. It was more like $150,000 per year to maintain status.

Secondly, you will no longer have reliable information on Edgar (SEC) about the company. Non-reporting companies take a huge discount in perceived share value.

Watch-out below. This was an action by a company that could care less about its shareholders IMO.

Why do you always want to spin a positive from such terribly negative news?

Did you notice how they tried to piggyback this with some positive announcements to stall the inevitable plunge?



icon url

ByloCellhi

06/22/08 10:18 PM

#22888 RE: SirFelix #22883

Felix

You're the best so going to the pink sheets to save money is a good thing. There is no - not one good reason to go to the pink sheets

The pink sheets are only for the unregulated crap companies.

You said: "I've seen blue chip stocks rise on cost-saving news, but what happens on the OTCBB is anyone's guess." and your point is??? The company's stock price is sub penny and you put in the same sentence as a blue chip?

What happen's? - is it will stay sub penny? and then be gone



icon url

losing money here

07/23/08 12:03 PM

#22923 RE: SirFelix #22883

You believe this company is trying to increase shareholder value? Not from where I am sitting. DOWN 97% IN MY PORTFOLIO! I am really losing money here! And so are you!