You may be happy, but you are wrong. From Conrad's e-mail: "So please note that there is no dilution" "So as you can see all of the corporate actions necessary for progression are extremely costly when you add up all the facts." And when you add up all the facts they are anot adding up properly. You and me know both the END result of this.
10 Million added at recent prices, when those shares could have been added at the very lows, or at the very highs ?
FACT #1: the 10 million heve been added to the FLOAT.
FACT #2: since a year ago, NO DILUTION until now.
FACT #3: no dilution at a quarter of a dollar (that was the best place to dilute just a little bit and get the funds. I have to conclude that this recent dilution didn't seek raising funds.
FACT #4: no dilution at 0.0007 where millions were dumped. I have to conclude that those millions were sold short by some crazy stupid broker not knowing what he was doing, or was it a mistake by someone selling at market who forgot to place a limit ?
Conclusion: There was short selling at the very lows, and since those shares were bought by people of this board (read back). Someone is short and stupid out there. They issue 10 more million recently. Two possible reasons:
1.- To let the stupid boy cover his possition at these levels (paying a premium but he won't have to cover millions at market).
2.- Insider found out that some stupid boy sold short at the historical lows, and has decided to get 10 million shares for himself, before the short squeeze begins.
Anyway I see it, this is going UP ONLY. Better option 2, for the short squeeze, but I will take either of them.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
