Replies to post #19946 on CSMG Technologies, Inc (fka CTGI)

[maddogs]

To fully leverage the inherent value of Ltc shares, beyond profit sharing, Ctgi should keep a figure north of 51%. This would allow tax basis. Ltc shares kept in "trust" by Ctgi, rather than distributed to Ctgi shareholders would keep that
51% at necessary levels north of 51%. Additional shares above 51% counts could then leverage additional funds thru a couple different vehicles, either shelving, warranting or simple exchange for example.

For this reason, available value and keeping majority interest,
imo, the LTC share structure will more closely approximate Dons
original figures, rather than the assumptive approximations (51%) that would be at least sensible, that are being thrown around.

Not to say, with all that is not clear at this point, that anything is not possible, I would suspect majority control of LTC, to be at the top any (Ctgi) corporate agenda.

[bbhuey]

Frankly,I thnk that Csmg with LTC's 13 subsidiaries
structure should be differently.

I understand that in some of the posts that each of these subisidiaries has the potential to generate revenues of $100M-$1 Billion per subsidiary if this is the case the LTC IPO would be very undervalued and CSMG as well.

Whereas LTC should be going IPO on each Subsidiary
separately and paying its royalties and licensing
revenues to LTC.

LTC wold own the technology as the finance subsidiary and issue a bond debenture to loan or support each of the subsidiaries with design and technolgy in exchage for
royalties and licensing revenues.

CSMG would remain the holding company owning LTC and the CO2
subsidiaries

Does anyone have any thoughts on this.

Regards,
bbhuey