InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,620.85
(
0.42%
)
US TECH 100
19,332.00
(
0.63%
)
Dow Jones
40,890.49
(
0.14%
)
Brent Oil
75.62
(
-0.09%
)
Bitcoin
61,180.00
(
0.00%
)
Post# of 35633
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

bbhuey

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 7
Posts 789
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/20/2003

bbhuey

Re: gotinearly post# 19946

Sunday, 06/15/2008 11:05:15 AM

Sunday, June 15, 2008 11:05:15 AM

Post# of 35633

Frankly,I thnk that Csmg with LTC's 13 subsidiaries
structure should be differently.

I understand that in some of the posts that each of these subisidiaries has the potential to generate revenues of $100M-$1 Billion per subsidiary if this is the case the LTC IPO would be very undervalued and CSMG as well.

Whereas LTC should be going IPO on each Subsidiary
separately and paying its royalties and licensing
revenues to LTC.

LTC wold own the technology as the finance subsidiary and issue a bond debenture to loan or support each of the subsidiaries with design and technolgy in exchage for
royalties and licensing revenues.

CSMG would remain the holding company owning LTC and the CO2
subsidiaries

Does anyone have any thoughts on this.

Regards,
bbhuey



Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up