InvestorsHub Logo

Bonez

05/28/08 6:43 PM

#61901 RE: William H Bonney #61899

Too many people keep claiming dilution ... maybe you need a refresher course on how to read charts??

Accumulation and money flow index doesnt lie my friends. Dilution would show the opposite of what we are seeing right now.

RizZo

05/28/08 6:51 PM

#61903 RE: William H Bonney #61899

Or maybe it is the opposite of what you post which is by far more the truth:)

jmo

RizZo

heelsgo1

05/28/08 6:53 PM

#61904 RE: William H Bonney #61899

Maybe they aren't buying back (which I think they aren't at present), maybe they are selling, selling selling as you say, maybe they are this and they are that... but I tell you one thing HCPC isn't doing maybe or otherwise:

HCPC is NOT losing me or many, many others on this board as shareholders no matter the extraneous efforts of the naysayers.

SPICEMIKE

05/28/08 7:11 PM

#61906 RE: William H Bonney #61899

Well..that is your opinion without making a phone call to the company! You know someone who runs a mortgage company yet you never ran a mortgage company!right(lol) let's see what happens in the near future and remember they aren't trying to sell there mortgage loans like your so called friends mortgage company does!(maybe he should get a job with hcpc?(joke)Overall, great plan by hcpc and looking forward to the results in the near future!(imo/fwiw)

SeattleITguy

05/28/08 10:53 PM

#61929 RE: William H Bonney #61899

Hey William,

1. The big deal fell through

Given the size of the loan, I think this is a legitimate concern. Guess we'll find out soon (hopefully).

2. There is another two billion shares in the O/S.

I suppose this could happen, too. There is sooooo much speculation about "buyback" and "dilution" on this board that it makes my head spin :)

3. Reverse split

While I completely understand your ration for thinking this to be a possibility, this is the one topic I would disagree with. Bare with me here for a second - the company has stated it's intention to uplist to the OTCQX by the end of 2008. Let's say that this is a feasible goal. In order to uplist, I believe they need to hold the PPS at or above $0.25 for 90 days. I base the 90-day figure on heresay, but am 95% sure that $0.25 PPS is required for uplisting.

A reverse split would not hold the PPS at $0.25 long enough to uplist, in my opinion. Therefore, I think they need to find other means of strengthening the PPS to achieve those levels. I think having audited financials (with 2008 showing some profit), along with the funding of the big loan could move the PPS in the right direction. A reverse split at these levels would surely be a bad idea if the company wants to become credible and uplist..