Replies to post #31164 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[dhwco]

Or, a simpler explanation.

A self proclaimed expert comes along. This "expert" advocates chartology as the only true measure of a stock price then waxes on about how a pink sheet is traded on emotion. He advocates transparency yet chastises those who demand disclosure and constantly tells those that have been with the company for several years to wait, that only "special people" who know how to keep their traps shut should be allowed to have any knowledge of what is really going on.

Now this expert thinks the stock price isn't doing what he thinks it should so he deems manipulation as the only "plausible" answer. To support that, he then proclaims that insiders are selling because they have some cheap shares. Some people believe him and panic (Maybe even some of the "insiders themselves") and sell in a thinly traded stock (averaging $5,000 a day in transactions is thin.)

Because of his conflicting positions, he can't just say that the stock is falling because there is no news to keep the price up. On paper this company has nothing until a deal is signed showing value. I believe a deal is in the future, not because of special knowledge, but because I believe in the Patents and Turrini. However others may be now wondering, largely due to the postings of this "expert" who has tended the seeds of doubt and distrust first sowed by a couple of stupid "insiders" who were pissed because I wanted PROPER disclosure.

[downsideup]

Sure, I'm "concerned" about the drop in share price.

Read carefully the post to which this one is written in reply. Note carefully the date of that post, and then look at a few CLYW charts... one a daily chart that covers the last three months, another a weekly chart that covers the last two years... ensuring both charts show you for that period the accumulation/distribution. Use a cross hair to locate that date on both charts, looking at accumulation/distribution...

Looks to me like what we're seeing on those charts is a turnover in the ownership of CLYW shares with long term holders surrendering something over 2 million shares in that time period ? Looks to me like the insiders who don't play well with others are getting whacked... and that will probably end when they correct their behavior in a verifiable way, or just go away ? I do expect it is a market reaction that will end when the underlying problem ends.

Perhaps I'm reading way too much into that and the timing is only a coincidence ??? Maybe the problem we see is back to one of "offshore shorts", who would have shown up right about the same time as the more semi- or faux language challenged hangers on here who type in the form of perfectly fractured English, as naruto et al, made a brief reappearance ?

Since the point at which I protested the insiders continued misbehavior, my choice to withdraw and wait out the result seems a good one. It is still looking exactly as if I'll be able to begin buying back in at the low prices I'd forecast back then based on that behavior... without having ridden the shares from $0.11 to $0.14 all the way down to $0.03.

I'm not rooting for the share price to continue its decline... I'm just pointing out the inevitable market consequences of the poor choices made by insiders. The awareness I shared here is working out for me... I'll end up with a lot more shares for the same money and a lot less carried risk when I do decide to begin buying in earnest.

Otherwise, what I see now is that my concern, expressed back then, that the unfortunate choices being made by insiders would end up hurting the company... as a dual function of the share price declines undermining the ability to raise needed capital... and the impact that lack of ability would have in delaying the time line in development... have been in large part ameliorated, I expect, by the graciousness shown in the Diac's choice to extend their notes. I still don't see that there have been any substantive changes in the story here... other than positive changes with the news of the additional patents. The same opportunity there was a few months ago still exists now... only now improved with Euro and Mexican patents on board... and now it is a better deal, on sale at 75% off.

I've begun buying small quantities of shares just recently... while limiting the numbers bought with a non-linear schema related to metering allocated cash out to follow chart rate/price patterns... so that as prices decline any additional purchases at lower prices will lower the basis in non-linear fashion. Today showed a fairly steady and steep rate of decline, not a bottoming behavior... which doesn't drive me into buying. I'm still targeting lower prices for buying. The goal is to NOT buy until near a bottom... and to buy no more than 1/4 of my intended holding before the bottom, no more than another 1/4 at the bottom... and the rest while chasing it on the way back up. I do think we are probably within $0.03 of the bottom from here ;<) ...but, no matter where you buy in, you are still entering a mere 100% away from zero ?