Or, a simpler explanation.
A self proclaimed expert comes along. This "expert" advocates chartology as the only true measure of a stock price then waxes on about how a pink sheet is traded on emotion. He advocates transparency yet chastises those who demand disclosure and constantly tells those that have been with the company for several years to wait, that only "special people" who know how to keep their traps shut should be allowed to have any knowledge of what is really going on.
Now this expert thinks the stock price isn't doing what he thinks it should so he deems manipulation as the only "plausible" answer. To support that, he then proclaims that insiders are selling because they have some cheap shares. Some people believe him and panic (Maybe even some of the "insiders themselves") and sell in a thinly traded stock (averaging $5,000 a day in transactions is thin.)
Because of his conflicting positions, he can't just say that the stock is falling because there is no news to keep the price up. On paper this company has nothing until a deal is signed showing value. I believe a deal is in the future, not because of special knowledge, but because I believe in the Patents and Turrini. However others may be now wondering, largely due to the postings of this "expert" who has tended the seeds of doubt and distrust first sowed by a couple of stupid "insiders" who were pissed because I wanted PROPER disclosure.
AI
