InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

brnyo

05/06/08 12:33 PM

#169398 RE: DK 212 #169396

RIGHT ON
icon url

lightbeam

05/06/08 12:37 PM

#169412 RE: DK 212 #169396

So your saying this has been fine since oct.? No I do not think so. Did TS have a choice? I do not know. We shall see.
icon url

ezxccsc

05/06/08 1:07 PM

#169447 RE: DK 212 #169396

DK212

With that thought then do you believe that the Yahoo shareholders who feel they were wronged by the Yahoo BOD should not complain either?

I know I mentioned another stock here but it is relevance to the statement that shareholders should not whine when infact the Yahoo shareholders have a point even if most consider them as whiners.
icon url

JimsZ

05/06/08 1:24 PM

#169468 RE: DK 212 #169396

Well...

No one was forced at gunpoint to buy, true... but at the same time they were not given the honest truth which could have helped them make a decision to "not buy".


Not only this, but supposedly someone out there received a letter from Tom stating "I tried sending money to buyback the cd's and they wouldn't let me". Well, why didn't he use this money to buyout Hackett's mortgages instead of going deeper into debt with YA with more debentures? Where did this money go? Think it was to an unprofitable company to try to keep the doors open and the shareholder hope alive!