Replies to post #37791 on Wave Systems Corp. (fka WAVXQ)

[Fullmoon]

spin, I doubt you'll get more than
three posters to support you in your contention that you do not want to see Wave fail. I think you're fairly honest about your trading. I don't think you're positive when long and negative when short. I think you're just plain negative and want to see the whole thing fail. Perhaps you've read HhH's treatise in the jailhouse on why TCG won't succeed.

And what's it to you if Wavoids are ridiculously greedy? So? Who appointed you the greed-monitor? They may be greedy, but they have their money, NOT YOURS, on the line.

Ya know, your relishing the "frequent opportunities to point out all the BS that oozes out of Lee" is really, really, weak.
I don't see frequent BS from Lee; what do I see are your frequent, repetitive posts on your favorite complaints about the company (With this recent exception: I do not understand the Bushnell release. I know the SEC has not requested additional documentation, so I am hoping this oversight, while very tardy, is still required based on the SEC inquiry.)


Some companies do release the end of an SEC investigation. That comes from the company, not the SEC, which can re-activate the inquiry at any time.

Lastly, your experience with a secondary is not necessarily indicative of all secondaries. While this example isn't either, check out Wave's post-offering performance in March,2000. Ya, Ya, it was the bubble, but I'm telling you they don't always go down.......

bolds (Think I'll change my handle)