InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

warbil

04/14/08 2:08 PM

#215993 RE: Ghors #215992

I guess we will soon know if Nokia has connections with Judge Batts if she clears her schedule for a qucik rehearing. How long does it normally take to get a remanded hearing back on the schedule?
icon url

jjff

04/14/08 2:34 PM

#215999 RE: Ghors #215992

Why does she get a second chance if she couldn't get it right the first time?
icon url

frobinso

04/14/08 2:36 PM

#216000 RE: Ghors #215992

Ok, because after her first showing, if it went to someone else I would actually feel more warm and fuzzy about the outcome.

Basic psychology says that once you buy a car and the color is Red, that from that point on your mind will begin to rationalize how nice the color Red is.

Based on this proven human behavioral pattern, I question that the process of Remanding something back is going to result in a different outcome, but would instead just motivate her to try very hard to justify her original ruling, and then pour us out.

That's why I regretted that whizzer's point about dismissing the case based on the pending SDNY case, because it would at least give her another way out that saves face - dismissal.

Let's face it, it it's remanded back she still has motivation to save face on her ruling from the bench.
icon url

my3sons87

04/14/08 2:38 PM

#216001 RE: Ghors #215992

Ghors, I was having a little fun. I have faith in the justices and feel better that the matter will be decided on the case filings rather than having a lot of techno babble BS bandied all about.