Replies to post #215760 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[dmiller]

whizz...why do you believe that IDCC's lawyers did not raise these points that you mention? The way you present them it almost seems like a no brainer not to raise these points. If what you say is true, mgt needs to re-evaluate the law firms that they retain imo.

Or maybe it's just easier to see these things as a back seat attorney?...lol That wasn't a jab at any of the attornies on this board....I really appreciate the insight that you guy's bring to us law ingnorant people on this board.

The points you bring up make a lot of sense so I cannot imagine why you and Loop see these things and the other attornies do not.

[frobinso]

Whizz and Loop,

With all the activism on the board, such as folks contacting senators and what not, I wish you, Loop, and Jimlur somehow had an avenue to give our legal team this tidbit that perhaps they needed to have this case dismissed. It would be like throwing yourself and all shareholders a golden bone.

I guess this is really the first instance where I feel discouraged at an oversight of our lawyers because they reach out so much across all these other cases cited, but it seems apparent the key that may have put this entire issue behind us was right under their nose in our own prosecution history with the devil himself.

It's a shame to see your talents and insights limited to calling it from the armchair when such insight could have been the turnaround, or grandslam that is needed at this crossroads.

No blame to you, I'm forever grateful to you, but just wish the legal team had their eyes and ears open to the board discussions, or that there was a conduit in a circumstance like this for someone like you and loop in this day and age where everyone is an e-mail address or phone number away, that such information could have been shared with our legal representatives for the good of the cause.

[infinite_q]

whizzer, regarding the Delaware case that was stayed because of the similarities to the issues involved with the ITC case, I have a question. Given that the case in Delaware was stayed pending the outcome of the ITC case, and given that NOK may now succeed in getting a stay or termination of the ITC proceedings, does that mean that the Delaware case can now be revived?

After all, NOK never raised the arbitration defense there and the only reason it was stayed was because the same issues were to be litigated at the ITC.