Another Yahoo reporter sticking up for their own. What she doesn't say is more important than what she did say. Apparently she has taken exception to the negative mail that was sent to Yahoo after the last hatchet job that was put out by Yahoo on IDCC. This is simply a follow up hatchet job by another reporter for Yahoo.
Investors in IDCC have real money at stake and will protect their investment when a story is published that is inaccurate. Neither reporter for Yahoo has any skin in the game so they obviously feel compelled to write whatever they want. What she doesn't say is that the first article was based on misinformation by the writer or just plain incompetence. The reported facts were simply inaccurate, incomplete or intentionally misleading. The article deserved a strong response from the IDCC faithful. Obviously, this writer doesn't feel the need to research the story either. She is just trying to portray IDCC investors as clueless.
Well, we all know who is clueless here and IDCC should prove itself in the near future. I'm not worried about my investment and no ill-prepared reporter will get me to shake loose of my shares.
Enough said. Let's forget her quickly and move on.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
