Curious as to why you would characterize the QCOM listing differently from IDCC's. Both seemed to be 'declaritory and non-specific', yet you say QCOM 'holds essential patents for the standard.'
What am I missing? How can QCOM not specify any patents yet be characterized as having claimed essentiality?
I am only trying to understand your comments. You have a tendency to be very cryptic in your posts for us dummies .