headcounselor thanks for.....
being up front and admitting your doubts in the first place. Keep in mind that having product ideas don't always mean that the public or market will buy into or accept that idea and or purchase that product to sustain business growth, you need to have the must have widget your selling in the market in order to have the business stay afloat in the first place. If you have been following one of the supplier companies, you will see a probable case to that point to that point. I do believe that the product marketing that was done by CyberKey was done well, I just don't know how effective it was when it was ran in the marketplace, the financial reports would have shed some light here on that issue.
The question here for me has been, who's scam was this? Plants or someone else's......... What makes sense to me is how these companies and CEO want to make it big but don't have the business knowledge or what I believe in this case as the scam potential to be taken in by outside scammers and influences. Sure everyone wants to believe it can't happen to them, but the reality is it can and does happen everyday the way a pickpocket has perfected the slide of the hand. Although the slide of hand would be considered an easy scam to the professional, what happened here was not only well coriagraphed but well funded too. In short, I believe Plant was duped, in short Plant is guilty for being trusting and gullible.
My opinion here is my own...........
Thanks again for confirming that the company still has someone answering the phones. With all the pressure on Plant, I can only see that as a positive sign. Upcoming trial will be interesting, very interesting.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
