InvestorsHub Logo

sidedraft

03/31/08 8:41 PM

#1329 RE: MetalHead #1327

So what is required is a ruling by FINRA/SEC/NASD...some controlling agency:

What does the Record Date mean in this case?


And what happened to the 10 day warning period?

ottoman

03/31/08 8:46 PM

#1330 RE: MetalHead #1327

thanks for that post isellbeachhomes!

Lol, I love this part........

To the shock and amazement of the company, it's stock apparently became the subject of a highly speculative scheme that was promoted by some unknown persons either directly to each other or ithrough "chat rooms"

Art2Gecko

03/31/08 9:14 PM

#1333 RE: MetalHead #1327

Gee, there's a "ringleader"???

bwahahah..

It's called reading the dailylist, mr drage...

pick

03/31/08 9:19 PM

#1335 RE: MetalHead #1327

What a load of crap!

All stock purchases are speculative in nature....that's why so many "safe harbour" statements and disclosures.


Well, according to ole Nate, we're part of same vast conspiracy to traffic in speculative stocks! Btw, who's this "ringleader"?

sidedraft

03/31/08 9:46 PM

#1337 RE: MetalHead #1327

Unfortunately the record date is the date that the existing shareholders decided to take the action, nothing more, nothing else.

Mr. Drage now wants to use the Record Date for his own back dating purposes, shame on him.



Phoenix-Rising

03/31/08 10:14 PM

#1343 RE: MetalHead #1327

anyone have Marrily's email?

swenglish

04/01/08 4:40 AM

#1353 RE: MetalHead #1327

wow! new heights of absurdity.

Thanks for posting that.

loss-pro

04/01/08 5:43 AM

#1354 RE: MetalHead #1327

there´re three(!) record dates involved.

the one mentioned in MXSV´s filings is the one which decides who gets the proxy (by mail etc.). this date not even determines who is entitled to vote, because if you sell between proxy and meeting...

the second one is the record date of the reverse split. it´s normally not explicitly mentioned because NASD sets the final date.

if they want to roundup a certain group, they have to determine the conditions: that involves size(500/100/50/10 evrything goes i guess) and time(third record date(!). if no separate date is mentioned, it´s the date of the split according to NASD, see SWNE/MCII or any other roundup that had no problems.


companies that did it right last year:
BDCG, FREZ and one or two others.

three record dates from BDCG(FREZ the same):

SPECIAL TREATMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS HOLDING FEWER THAN 2910 (BUT AT LEAST 100) COMMON STOCK SHARES AND FRACTIONAL SHARE TREATMENT


The Company’s Board approved special treatment of stockholders of record as of the Record Date holding fewer than 2910 shares of common stock to prevent those stockholders from holding less than 100 shares after the reverse split. The special treatment is being afforded to preserve round lot stockholders (i.e., holders owning at least 100 shares).


Accordingly, stockholders holding less than 2910 shares but at least 100 shares as of November 19, 2007, and who continue to hold such shares as of the record date of the reverse split, will receive 100 shares of common stock after the reverse split. STOCKHOLDERS PURCHASING LESS THAN 2910 SHARES BUT AT LEAST 100 SHARES AFTER NOVEMBER 19, 2007, AND WHO CONTINUE TO HOLD SUCH SHARES AS OF THE RECORD DATE OF THE REVERSE SPLIT, SHALL NOT BE AFFORDED SPECIAL TREATEMENT.




of stockholders of record as of the Record Date
= established a record date through another one

loss-pro

04/01/08 5:52 AM

#1355 RE: MetalHead #1327

another one:

according to that fax, i am not even "entitled" to the reverse split:

[...]certain corporate action to be taken for Shareholders of Record at September 14, 2007. One of those corporate actions included a 500 to 1 reverse split of stock.[...]


i wasn´t S/H of record as of that date. so no split for me...


and i obviously missed the filing where they reduced the 1000:1 to 500:1 ... or was it 1:1000...

gabkok

04/01/08 6:53 AM

#1357 RE: MetalHead #1327

He (Drake) and his law firm are very funny. May be there is no internet in their office (or they don't even know how internet works). They should know that almost all investors can read, and SEC filings are public information which are available the moment they are filed.

TEX

04/01/08 11:30 AM

#1365 RE: MetalHead #1327

omg!

jeez..."ring leader"

too ef'ing funny...

Wildbilly

04/01/08 11:51 AM

#1371 RE: MetalHead #1327

LMAO @ "ring leader".