Replies to post #210913 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[SSALNER]

count,

You are telling me if I had stated that I heard it from someone at the courthouse it would have prevented this uproar? Personally, I dont see it adding one bit of credability as I could have said I heard it anywhere or from anyone which you would be unable to substantiate anyway.

Now if I could have posted a link to a web page article, pacer filing, sec filing, etc I can see how that would have added credibility, but I obviously couldn't do that in this case.

Bottom line is there are a bunch of jerks here on this board that can kiss my arse. Many of you have some growing up to do.

There are a smaller group of standup guys.

Personally, I have read just about every post on this board, atomic bob's and the raging bull board since about 2000 and I take each post with a grain of salt until I personally read the press release, sec filing or news article.

[Danny Detail]

The Count .. SSALNER posted at 11:09 this morning that Teecee was at the hearing:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=27798570. When I saw his post you referenced it was clear to me .. and I think it should have been to anyone .. that his info came from Teecee.

However the post was not as helpful as it could've been by taking another minute to post a bit of detail.

And he has an obligation to do so, WHY?? Because, according to you, There are a lot of people reading this board that have life changing amounts of money invested in IDCC. This is a critical time, so if you post factual information do try to give information on the source.

What possible sense of entitlement led you to the conclusion that he should be cognizant of and responsible for individuals unknown to him who have chosen to bet the farm on IDCC. What you are getting on this board is FREE. If his post didn't come up to your standards of being as helpful as it can be what gives you the right to point out his shortcomings according to The Count's rules of effective posting and, by implication, to ask him to try to do better in the future.

Maybe he thought it was more important to everyone on this board to get the bottom line decision out as quickly and as concise as possible knowing that the details would follow. Maybe he is a very busy man who didn't have enough time to post sufficient detail to satisfy you. What he posted was FACTUAL, not a rumor or comment meant to manipulate the stock price to the downside. To then use his lack of detail and disclosure of the source as an excuse for some of the hostile response is equivalent to an all to common defense tactic of blaming the victim.

MO,
Danny