I'll concede the known’s, but argue (in a healthy way) the possibilities...
It would seem at first glance your liking of the odds are based on these possibilities - which, as I've agued in the past, GTEM is loathe to deliver on. How do you justify your odds internally with the fact they have delivered on few (if any sustentative) of past "possibilities" (and call it logic)?
I know you’re a supporter of JL because he always delivered in your view on what he said he would...but that reputation is now tarnished as well, no? If not, why not?
All truth is simple. Is that not doubly a lie?
...Friedrich Nietzsche