No, I am not saying at all that there is a significant short position. Beebe's actions validate the fact that there is not a significant short position.
I did suggest, that IF there was a significant short position, that possibly the best way to beat that obstacle would be to stop diluting and perform. Beebe has not done this. It is clear by his actions that he is, in fact, NOT battling that obstacle.
Unless perhaps Beebe is clueless and incompetant? So, which do you think it is?
A) The stock has been shorted and a clueless and incompetant leader is at the helm.
B) The stock has not been shorted and a greedy leader using shares as an ATM machine is at the helm.
I would be open to thoughts on which scenario is more plausible.
GLTY
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
