And in addition: for end user it is not important at all if it has working reliable service. But technical aspects and benefits play important role in negotiations with carries or any other valuable players.
Scanbuy (Ezcode), Beetag, OP3 (Shotcode), Nextcode (mcode) use proprietary 2d code. The reason why Nextcode decided to create MCODE is because outside of Asia (Japan/Korea), there is not a macro mode and autofocus in most camera phones. http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/archives/2006-04/0050.html Is that the same reason why Scanbuy has decided to use Ezcode instead of using QR or Datamatrix. We know that Scanbuy's Scanlife can read 2d open standard barcodes (Datamatrix and QR).
What is needed for mass adoption? * 2d Open standard barcodes - Direct encoding * Indirect encoding???? (I don't see how it is possible)
Can different Mobile barcode scanning companies coexist? Most people are not really familiar to download applications to their phones. Furthermore, I don't think people will install 4 or 5 barcode readers on their phones. For example, if I installed Kaywa reader on my phone, I would only able to read 2d open standard barcodes (QR, Datamatrix).
Rich said... http://amir4.blogspot.com/2007/07/mobile-code-scanning-selecting.html "Dear Anonomous, Let me tell you why you are wrong and that Direct URLS can CERTAINLY be dynamic... Conclusion: I think the only benefit of the indrect method is counting how many times a person re-clicks a link."
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
