Replies to post #7360 on Mosaic ImmunoEngineering Inc (CPMV)

[wolfpackvoltare]

I've been invested in the stock market for over 40 years, and being reinvested in PTSC has been the most mind boggling event I have ever been in. I've come to the conclusion there is going to be a buyout offer from TPL to PTSC. The BOD and CEO has completely shut down any communication with investors leaving most of us in the dark as to what is happening. This all started when Mr. Turley canceled all his marketing efforts of PTSC in early December. You have Nick Tredennick who sits on both boards (TPL/PTSC) and his expertise could be used in the merger of the two companies. TPL's only interest in PTSC is to get control of the MMP portfolio, also, PTSC has been reduced to a shell corporation over the last two years. Remember, PTSC sells nothing, or offer services to anyone. The only source of income was Holocom in which they sold a majority interest to Pilot Power Group, and let them have a controlling interest in DataSecurus, LLC (Formerly Holocom Multi-Domain Computers.) TPL has been calling all the shots on PR's and the wording of them. They are running PTSC now, and it shows in the complete shut down of PTSC's CEO, Mr Turley. (IMO)

[curt504]

Hi Annie, PTSC is probably my last penny play I'm glad to say. I've moved to trading index ETFs and futures because these markets and vehicles require less DD / PR fuss and bad news taking out 50% of your value over night. PTSC is following other penny stocks I've played that by definition have only one trick pony. If PTSC is like other situations a quiet period like this on the heals of probable deals usually means very bad news and management is working on a dead cat bounce deal save. I say these things while having allocated an insane portion of my portfolio to PTSC. So I'm with everyone here, hoping for positive news and much higher PPS!

Re the posts here on _general_ patent litigation and legislation. I'd wish that it was filtered to be relevant to PTSC's patents and their strenght / weakness. Lawyers posting FUD (if it is FUD as apposed to directly relevant to PTSC) to generate new leads and fees is not appreciated and doesn't do PTSC's PPS any good.

If you are a patent lawyer and you post legislative / court rulings that are not from PTSCs case, please also give your opinion as to the relevancy to PTSC and stock holder risk? Thanks!

Curt