We never mentioned we were for either side to remain neutral. What needs to be dealt with can be done after the deal is complete. We did not say we approve of him, but the fact remains that Summit will manage and control the company in the end. In the meantime in the interests of the shareholders the Summit deal should go through. There is a saying you all know. "What goes around, comes around full circle".
What is more important? A vendetta or a very important deal to increase shareholder value? Which one will make shareholders more money?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
