InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

nwsun

12/27/07 7:48 PM

#97392 RE: clarity789 #97391

its only a stupid action if he doesnt use the information to clean up the market place and expose the the naked shorting industry imo...

and a question for anybody, what does the member mark feature do? i noticed ive had 8 of them ever since the lawuit... the 9th one im pretty sure i know who it is and is a recent mark...im a basic member so i dont know all the features and what they are used for...
icon url

coinsguy

12/28/07 3:51 AM

#97409 RE: clarity789 #97391

clarity, in his deposition for the suit you brought against him for attorney's fees and expungement, Megas stated he was ordered to sue by the DTC. He also stated he tried to convince the DTC to find a solution that did not require litigation but the DTC insisted he sue in order to find out who held counterfeit shares and where they came from.

Since the suit against the shareholders proved virtually all of them were naked shorted shares rather than counterfiet, perhaps the brokers had to settle with Megas after all and that is why they are now legit. Or perhaps the brokers have agreed to buy back all the air shares on the open market, leaving only legit shares moving forward in to the R/S.

Personally, I don't expect a R/S until the air shares are resolved. Its just a gut feeling but I could be wrong. Megas could have very well agreed to do a R/S first to make it easier for the brokers to cover the air shares since many people will be wiped out by a R/S and wont need to be covered. There would still be sufficient air shares on the market to force a short squeeze but it would lessen the damage to the brokers.
icon url

mastaflash

12/28/07 9:53 AM

#97419 RE: clarity789 #97391

Blame the DTC...it was their idea lol!