InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,319.31
(
2.30%
)
US TECH 100
17,995.20
(
3.48%
)
Dow Jones
39,446.49
(
1.76%
)
Brent Oil
78.82
(
0.55%
)
Bitcoin
59,608.33
(
8.32%
)
Post# of 159752
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

clarity789

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 213
Posts 8379
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/18/2006

clarity789

Re: mastaflash post# 97390

Thursday, 12/27/2007 7:43:01 PM

Thursday, December 27, 2007 7:43:01 PM

Post# of 159752
You don't think the money spent on that lawsuit could have been better spent? Like perhaps against Jay Dewhurst?

How about a single broker? Like SACM? Surely Megas was serious when he accused them of selling counterfeits... so why not sue them?

This whole claim that Megas sued shareholders just to get the goods on the bad guys is so bogus it stinks.

If he got the goods, then WHY is he making all those shares valid?

Why was it sooooo clever to instead sue shareholders? What good did it do? After 8 months, I think that is a fair question.

I think it was one of the most stupid acts I've ever heard a CEO do.

Those who believe without reason... cannot be convinced by reason

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up