White, "but any longer than that would be sheer business ignorance."
we thought it was ignorance that HP didn't turn on the TPM, or they didn't bundle software with the TPM, and that it wasn't preinstalled. HP has a history of ignorance, or they recognize the TPM is not an effective tool as of yet.
I believe it would be more accurate to consider when HP feels the TPM is necessary as a product tool toward sales and better support fo their customers.
Interestingly enough, I believe HP will have to "up" their offering soon. the NEC announcement was important in showing the world that Trusted Computing is moving into a higher importance. Let's face it, NEC didn't need to search out a solution they are going to pay for (Wave). they could have simply chosen the HP way of bundling nothing and doing nothing, but saying (yeah, we have a TPM).
So why did NEC choose to pay for an option at this time? What's going on for them to want to have a better solution and not just a statement of "we have it too".
I think by mid to end 2008, all enterprise PC OEM builders will have a working solution for the TPM. Hope I'm right as it will open a whole lotta new doors for Wave.