InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

chefdujour

12/11/07 8:37 AM

#43848 RE: chefdujour #43847

btw, gmta
icon url

also nwtrader

12/11/07 8:55 AM

#43849 RE: chefdujour #43847

Historically, I heard this very argument numerous of times from other now defunk pinksheets and OTCB companies. Every now and then, you do get one that does strike gold in their plans. The charts looks good in our case and they have a great product that I believe in during this inflationary period that we are living in from the collapse of the dollar value. Sometimes a company expands too rapidly and would be better off to move slower too offset building development cost. The price of building materials and property is getting down to pre-housing bubble prices. It now cost less to build or replace something that was priced at it peak in demand such as; copper, lumber, cement, steel, aluminum, fuel, and labor. Waiting would be a cost saving at this time. The financial market is not going to hold up in the mess that it is in, even with the Feds manipulating the interest rate or dollar value. It would be better to leave it alone and let the market float and adjust to a fair market price. A slow steady growth is better than a rapid growth that causes boom and bust cycles.
icon url

CTigerHDragon

12/11/07 9:09 AM

#43850 RE: chefdujour #43847

That is what I am thinking.
First we develope and go to lets say 10 cents pps.
Then a 5:1 RS to 50 cents right before we move to OTC exchange.
That makes MNTY more acceptable to OTC exchange candidacy.
Then we move pps from 50 cents up to $5+ on OTC exchange.

That would be the equivalent of a $1 pps without the RS which is a goal of many.

A RS without the move to OTC is not good and will only happen if it is best for MNTY and Dez has stongly indicated that MNTY does not want to do a RS because as he said "it is often very harmful" and he does not want to harm MNTY but he wants MNTY to succeed.

If flippers and manipulators keep our price at 0.0027 forever then that is another story and a RS may be needed but with more and more stores opening - I think it would be very unlikely that our price will remain stuck for long in sub-pennies. All we need to do is more to 1 cent and then from there up to 5-10 cents (once we get to one cent with more stores open we are off to the races!).

I would NOT expect a RS on Jan 1st 2008 and I would say that is a silly prediction or a basher manipulation - so we may just need to put them on IGNORE.

imho


icon url

opeum

12/11/07 9:58 AM

#43879 RE: chefdujour #43847

5 stores isn't enough fuel for another chain in my opinion! even with R/S

need like 50, unless you want OTCBB, then < 50 is feasible

JMO